Dune Vaissaud vs Margaux Komano Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 11:36 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Vaissaud vs M. Komano

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Vaissaud 1 - 0 Komano
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dune Vaissaud winning 2 and Margaux Komano winning 0. The last match between Dune Vaissaud and Margaux Komano was at the W15 Monastir, 16-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Dune Vaissaud getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vaissaud | 1 |
| Komano | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Monastir(10-16-25)
D. Vaissaud vs M. Komano H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.36% (27-17) | Career Total W/L | 46.09% (112-131) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Vaissaud vs M. Komano Match Preview:
- In recent months, Dune Vaissaud has demonstrated stronger second serve performance, winning 38.11% of points compared to Margaux Komano's 36.59%.
- Could Dune Vaissaud's superior second serve points win percentage influence the match outcome? It often does.
- Vaissaud also has an edge in returning second serves, with a 53.21% success rate, ahead of Komano's 49.82%.
- What about first serve returns? Komano slightly edges Vaissaud at 34.21% compared to 33.18%.
- Under pressure, Dune has saved 48.81% of breakpoints, while Margaux has saved 47.65%.
- Over the past year, Vaissaud has a higher match win percentage at 62.86% compared to Komano's 56.60%.
- Both players excel on hard courts with a 62% win rate, showing similar strengths on this surface.
- Player level shows Vaissaud with a slight advantage in win rates (63.64%) versus Komano's (60.00%) at Futures/ITF tournaments.
- Komano has faced slightly tougher opponents, with an average rank difference about 47 ranks higher than Vaissaud's opponents.
- In deciding sets, Komano has proven more resilient, winning 67% of those, as opposed to Vaissaud's 36%.
- Which player will shine if it goes to a final set? The data supports Komano here.
- Do recent tournament results favor either player? Current event dynamics can shift outcomes but require event-specific analysis.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
Dune Vaissaud exhibits a slightly superior second serve performance and returning efficiency. Consistently saving more breakpoints under duress is another advantage Vaissaud holds.
While Vaissaud's overall win rate over the past year points to marginal superiority, Margaux Komano's prowess in deciding sets could become critical should the match extend to the limit.
Though both players perform best on hard courts and compete largely at a similar level in tournaments, Komano's experience against higher-ranked players might provide an additional edge.
Considering all factors, while Vaissaud displays some strong statistics, Margaux Komano's ability to clinch deciding sets makes her a slight favorite for victory in their upcoming match.
Dune Vaissaud vs Margaux Komano Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Vaissaud vs M. Komano H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:8:33 | Average Match Time | 1:8:33 |
| 71% (34/48) | 1st Serve % | 80% (44/55) |
| 62% (21/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (23/44) |
| 86% (12/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 18% (2/11) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 55% (30/55) | Return Points Win % | 31% (15/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Vaissaud Recent Matches Played
M. Komano Recent Matches Played

D. Vaissaud vs M. Komano Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.36% (27/17) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.09% (112/131) |
| 61.39% (62/39) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.53% (255/293) |
| 55.48% (511/410) | Games Win/Loss | 49.00% (2512/2615) |
| 62.79% (27/16) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.34% (80/89) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.07% (26/33) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (6/9) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 45 | Aces Total | 78 |
| 0.34 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 155 | Total Double Faults | 307 |
| 1:21:5 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 231.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 278.05 |
| 58% (1459/2508) | 1st Serve % | 70% (5059/7259) |
| 62% (903/1459) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (2773/5059) |
| 45% (467/1049) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (882/2200) |
| 51% (170/332) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (398/795) |
| 49% (1191/2446) | Return Points Win % | 45% (3185/7073) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Challenger W/L | 32.14% (9/19) |
| 61.90% (26/16) | Futures W/L | 47.91% (103/112) |
| 61% (27/44) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (111/241) |
| 14% (1/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (12/36) |
| 38% (5/13) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (32/64) |
| 83% (30/25) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (111/97) |
| 17% (30/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (111/14) |
| 14% (14/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (132/14) |